f97.beERIK SCHMIDT’S WORKSHOP
← All terms

Glossary · Energy industry & energy transition

Governance

Governance Energy System regulation Institutions market rules security of supply Climate protection Affordability conflicting objectives

In the electricity system, governance refers to the entirety of rules, responsibilities, procedures and incentives through which decisions are prepared, made, implemented and monitored. This includes laws, regulation, market rules, technical standards, planning procedures, data obligations, oversight, financing and clear lines of responsibility. Governance is therefore not a single institution. It is the order under which many actors work together: ministries, parliaments, regulatory authorities such as the Federal Network Agency, transmission system operators, distribution system operators, power generators, suppliers, industry, municipalities, European institutions and consumers.

Governance is particularly important in the energy system because electricity cannot be treated like an arbitrary commodity. Feed-in and consumption must be in balance at every moment, and transport is bound by the physical limits of the grid. Grid frequency, voltage, congestion management, reserve provision and balancing group management are technical requirements that are linked to market processes and legal provisions. Anyone who builds a power plant, connects a wind turbine, operates a heat pump, charges an electric car or markets a storage unit acts within an order. This order determines what is permitted, who bears which costs, which data must be reported and what remuneration or burden arises.

Distinction from government, regulation and management

Governance must be distinguished from government. Government means the political leadership and its formal decisions. Governance is the broader steering order in which political objectives, technical responsibilities, market mechanisms and operational responsibility interlock. Regulation, too, is only one part of it: it sets rules for grids, markets and companies, for instance through the Federal Network Agency or through European requirements. Governance additionally covers the questions of how objectives are set, data are collected, conflicts are decided and investments are triggered, and how responsibility is coordinated across several levels.

Nor is governance the same as management. Management usually refers to operational leadership within an organisation. Governance determines which organisation is responsible for what, which decisions it may take and how it is supervised. A transmission system operator does not run the grid at its own discretion. It works within statutory requirements, technical grid codes and European operating standards, and under regulatory supervision. Likewise, an electricity supplier does not design its products freely, but must comply with balancing group rules, consumer protection obligations and billing requirements. This embedding is governance.

Legal framework: EU and Germany

In EU law, governance is also an established legal term. Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of 11 December 2018 creates the "Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action" system. This governance mechanism is based on long-term strategies and on integrated national energy and climate plans (NECPs), each covering ten years, the first for 2021 to 2030. In addition there are progress reports by the Member States and monitoring by the EU Commission. The Regulation provides for a structured, iterative dialogue between the Commission and the Member States as well as public participation in the national plans. It covers the five dimensions of the Energy Union: energy security, the internal energy market, energy efficiency, decarbonisation, and research, innovation and competitiveness. Anyone reading about "Energy Union Governance" in EU documents therefore often means precisely this planning and reporting procedure and not the general term.

In Germany, the Energy Industry Act (Energiewirtschaftsgesetz, EnWG) forms the central framework. Under section 1(1) EnWG, the grid-bound supply of electricity, gas and hydrogen is to be as secure, affordable, consumer-friendly, efficient, environmentally compatible and greenhouse-gas-neutral as possible and increasingly based on renewable energy. This objective provision alone shows that several goals must be pursued at the same time and weighed against each other. Under section 1(2), grid regulation serves effective and undistorted competition and a permanently efficient and reliable operation of the grids. In doing so, it is to take into account, among other things, forward-looking grid expansion, digitalisation, flexibilisation including energy storage, and an appropriate distribution of grid costs. Section 1(4) names, for the electricity sector, among other things free price formation, the balancing of supply and demand on the electricity markets at all times, and the strengthening of the internal electricity market.

How important the question is of who may take which decision is shown by the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 2 September 2021 (C-718/18). The Court upheld the Commission's action on all four counts. One count concerned the Federal Network Agency: it lacked the independence required under Union law because ordinances of the Federal Government set it requirements on grid access and grid charges that were too detailed. The legislator responded with the EnWG amendment that entered into force on 29 December 2023. It deleted the previous ordinance-making powers and replaced them with determination powers of the Federal Network Agency. The old ordinances now apply only on a transitional basis, for gas until the end of 2027 and for electricity until the end of 2028. During this time the authority may already deviate from them. The rules on grid charges will thus in future be set more strongly by the regulatory authority itself. This is a governance question at its core: it concerns independence, democratic accountability and responsibility.

Rules, responsibilities and incentives

The effect of governance is rarely visible in a single provision, but in the interplay of several rules. A support mechanism can trigger investment in renewable generation, while slow permitting and missing grid connections hold back the same investments. Strongly fluctuating exchange prices with large price differences between individual hours can make flexibility economically attractive. Grid charge structures, metering requirements or unclear controllability can, however, make its use more difficult. A political expansion target for wind energy remains ineffective if land-use planning, species protection assessment, tender design, grid connection and local participation do not fit together.

Technical possibilities alone therefore do not guarantee an effect in the system. Battery storage can shift electricity over time, heat pumps can run flexibly, electric cars can shift their charging power, and some industrial processes can respond to price signals. Whether these possibilities are actually used depends on metering systems, tariffs, market products, grid rules, liability issues and remuneration models. Flexibility is thus not only a technical property of installations, but also the result of institutional design.

The same applies to investment. Anyone investing in generation, grids, storage or controllable loads needs reliable expectations about future revenues and obligations. These do not arise from wholesale prices alone. They also depend on grid charges, capacity mechanisms, connection rules, support regimes, CO₂ prices, the duration of permitting procedures and the regulatory recognition of costs. Governance does not decide on every individual investment. But it shapes how risks are distributed, and thus whether investments take place in time and in the right place.

Why governance becomes visible in the electricity system

The electricity system used to be organised in a strongly centralised way. Large power plants fed in predictably, consumption followed relatively stable daily and annual patterns, and the grids were designed for supply from a few central sources. With wind energy, photovoltaics, decentralised installations, electromobility, heat pumps and digital control, this order is changing. Generation depends more on the weather, consumption becomes partly controllable, distribution grids become active parts of the system, and millions of small decisions feed back into grid operation and the market.

This change is not merely a technical one. It shifts responsibilities. Distribution system operators need to know more about local loads, feed-in and connection requests. Transmission system operators must balance fluctuations across large areas and take European electricity flows into account. Market actors seek revenues from short-term price fluctuations. Consumers partly operate their own installations. Municipalities become more important for land, heat planning and local acceptance. Governance must determine how these roles work together, which data are shared, which rights plant operators have and when grid operators may intervene to control.

This becomes particularly clear in the case of security of supply. It does not arise from sufficient installed capacity alone. It depends on whether enough firm capacity, grid capacity, balancing energy, fuel, IT security and operational capacity to act are available in critical hours. Each of these levels has its own responsibilities. A market can signal short-term scarcity through prices. But it does not decide by itself which reserve obligations apply, how system-relevant power plants are treated or how rare extreme events are covered. This requires rules, procedures and responsibility.

Distinction from market and planning

Governance is often used imprecisely when what is actually meant is market design, state planning or regulation. The electricity market matches supply and demand through prices and contracts. It can indicate scarcity, surpluses and flexibility needs, but only within the rules that are set for it. These include bidding zones, balancing group rules, imbalance energy prices, trading deadlines, access requirements and the control of market power. The electricity market is thus a part of governance, not a substitute for it.

Planning concerns long-term infrastructure decisions, such as grid development plans, land designations, power plant strategies or hydrogen infrastructure. It can ease coordination problems because it makes expected developments visible and relates investments to one another. But it can also override or distort market processes if responsibilities are unclear or assumptions are not regularly reviewed. Governance determines which decisions are planned, which are coordinated through markets and which are set by regulation.

Regulation is the legal and economic oversight of areas in which competition is insufficient or natural monopolies exist. Electricity grids are typical natural monopolies, because parallel lines would be inefficient from a macroeconomic perspective. For this reason, revenue caps, grid access, grid charges and investment conditions are regulated, in Germany within the framework of incentive regulation. Governance goes beyond this. It links grid regulation with climate targets, industrial policy, European electricity trading and the question of how costs are distributed socially.

Typical misunderstandings

  • Governance is mere bureaucracy: Bureaucracy can hinder governance if procedures are slow, contradictory or poorly informed. Without robust procedures, however, other problems arise: unclear liability, uncertain investment, opaque cost distribution and interventions without accountability. In the electricity system, perverse incentives can lead to grid congestion, additional reserve needs, delays and higher system costs.

  • A correctly set price solves everything: Prices make scarcity and costs visible. But they do not replace a decision on which risks are insured at the level of society, how grid costs are distributed, which data access is necessary or which safety standards apply as a minimum. A price does not determine whether a hospital is treated differently in an extreme case than a deferrable charging session.

  • Governance is purely national: The German electricity market is integrated into the European internal market, and electricity flows follow the lines, not the borders. European rules shape market coupling, grid operation, congestion management, state aid law, emissions trading and the assessment of security of supply. The EnWG expressly names the implementation of Union law as a purpose of the Act. National decisions have repercussions on neighbouring countries and vice versa.

  • Rules are neutral: Rules distribute costs, risks and options for action. Grid charges influence whether a location is attractive for industry. Connection sequences decide which projects are realised first. Support designs influence which technologies prevail, and balancing rules determine who pays for forecast errors. Good governance makes such distributional effects verifiable and correctable.

Governance as a way of dealing with conflicting objectives

Energy policy pursues several objectives at the same time: security of supply, climate protection, affordability, competitiveness, local acceptance, nature and landscape protection, resilience and European integration. These objectives cannot be permanently translated into a single indicator. The list of objectives in section 1 EnWG already shows this. Very rapid grid expansion can come into conflict with participation and litigation rights. The lowest possible electricity prices can make it harder to finance necessary infrastructure. Relieving individual regions shifts costs to others. And anyone who looks only at CO₂ reduction may overlook questions of grid stability or raw material dependence.

Governance does not make conflicting objectives disappear. It determines how they are handled: with transparent criteria, reliable data, clear deadlines, defined responsibilities for weighing them up and procedures for correction. If grid congestion increases, for example, it is not enough to say that more grids must be built. It must be clarified who determines the need, how alternatives such as redispatch, storage, flexible loads or regional price signals are assessed, who bears the costs and how wrong decisions are reviewed afterwards. Conflicts arise where technical possibility, market rule and political responsibility diverge.

In the transformation of the electricity system, governance becomes a prerequisite for the system being able to learn. Much is uncertain: the pace of electrification, industrial electricity demand, hydrogen demand, the expansion paths of renewable energy, acceptance of grid infrastructure, the availability of skilled workers and geopolitical risks. A rigid order would cope poorly with this uncertainty, and an arbitrary one would be too uncertain for investment. Sustainable governance combines long-term reliability with regulated adaptation. The European energy and climate plans, with their progress reports and updates, are an example of such a built-in review cycle.

What the term makes visible

The term governance helps to avoid narrowing technical and economic debates too early. When power plants are missing, this is also about market rules, permits, reserve products and revenue risks. When electricity prices are high, it is also about levies, grid charges, procurement, wholesale trading, load profiles and European price coupling. For storage, it is about grid access, double charging, marketing rights and system-serving behaviour. And for digitalisation, it is about data protection, controllability, metering, IT security and responsibility in the event of malfunctions.

The term thus protects against overly simple explanations of cause and effect. A problem in the electricity system rarely has only a technical or only a political cause. It often arises because rules from earlier phases of the system meet new requirements. A grid connection procedure that was sufficient for a few large installations does not automatically suit many decentralised projects. A tariff model that presupposes passive consumers reflects controllable loads only incompletely. A market rule that increases efficiency in the short term can neglect long-term investment security. Anyone who wants to understand an effect must look at the rule that produces it.

In short, governance in the electricity system is the order of bindingness. It determines how technical requirements, economic incentives and political objectives are brought together. The term does not explain every individual decision. But it shows whether an energy system merely formulates objectives or also has the institutions to implement them under real conditions.

Sources

Related glossary entries

Edited by eCMS on 12.11.2026 05:05

© 2026 Erik Schmidt. All rights reserved. Quotations with a link to the source are welcome.